Meant for the wild, animals are bred and killed for science.
“Over 10 million animals—including frogs, rats, cats, sheep, and more—are killed and used in classroom dissection each year,” according to Riseforanimals.org.
A range of creatures in high school levels of science are now cut open for investigation. However, the sight of a dead animal, sprawled out on a table for research can scare teenagers who want to pursue a career in the field of science.
“Animal dissection is not required by the College Board for AP Biology, the International Baccalaureate for IB Biology, or the Next Generation Science Standards. The inclusion of dissection units actually dissuades some students from taking elective science classes,” according to procon.org.
With advanced technology, developments of online simulations act as an alternative method for students. This creates an environment where teenagers aren’t pushed away from scientific jobs in the future, remaining interested rather than repulsed.
“Dozens of peer-reviewed studies show that dissecting animals is bad science, whereas when students use modern methods, they learn faster and are able to repeat material until they’re proficient,” according to peta.org.
Organizations such as the Humane Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have said dissection can prove costly in comparison to alternative practices. While still effectively teaching students, replacing outdated techniques can save money.
While taking into consideration hands-on experience is good for students, it shouldn’t cost lives. Utilization of other resources can advance schools and deepen teens’ interest in different aspects of the world of science.
In Michigan, a dissection-choice policy is in place. This policy allows students who are uncomfortable to opt out of dissection practices. Peta.org also provides a slip that acts as a permission slip for students to not participate in animal dissection.
